Saturday, December 31, 2005
THIS DIVIDED STATE was placed on a list of the best 25 documentary films of 2005 by Video Librarian Magazine, a nationally distributed publication for hundreds of thousands of libraries.
Also on the list was MARCH OF THE PENGUINS, MURDERBALL, NO DIRECTION HOME (Martin Scorcese), and other blockbusters. Wow, I'm glad we made it to someone's "best of" list.
See the full list here.
Bryans update here: HERE is the link to the official Video Librarian Online announcement.
Friday, December 30, 2005
The story is bizarre. The book is good.
I would advise reading the story and then reading the book.
Thursday, December 29, 2005
I'd seen the film a couple of more times between then and now and felt the same way, although I warmed up to it more and more each time.
I watched it again last night and it finally clicked. It wasn't the movie that was missing something. It was me. The moment that finally clicked for me was when Steve wonders allowed if the Jaguar Shark remembers him and and he almost breaks down into tears. I think part of my prblem the first few viewings was that I was watching a Wes Anderson movie and felt that the characters were safe. I didn't think that Wes Anderson would kill Kingsley (Ned) ZISSOU. The first time I watched it I was wracking my brain to figure out if he'd really died or not.
IU was worried too much about things on the surface. What this movie really is, aside from a brilliant comedy, is a story about a man who's life has been unravelling for a decade and everyone around him sees it. The film is about the that moment where he realizes it. Sadly, it takes the loss of his best friend and a son he never had to show him.
This is a touching story about a man coming to a realization of his life. I was just too bamboozled by it's amazing delivery to get it until now.
Maybe I'm an idiot. Maybe I should have gotten it the first time, but I imagine that the reason everyone said it wasn't as good as Wes Andersons other movies when it came out was because they just didn't know what to look for yet.
Wednesday, December 28, 2005
Elias and Derek watch Saturday Night Live quite often it seems and they'd both been telling me about the Chronicles of Narnia rap and how awesome it was.
I watched it.
It was funny, but I didn't expect this out of it: "The Chronicles of Narnia Rap" Officially Cultural Phenomenon.
Maybe it's not so surprising considering the article is from that ne'er-do-well liberal rag "The New York Times."
Monday, December 26, 2005
She's cut some of the best films in the last 25 years. From Raging Bull to Goodfellas to Casino to the Aviator, she's cut them all. And she's arguably one of the best music montage editors in history. Granted, she has Martin Scorsese standing behind her every step of the way, that doesn't take away from the fact that she's the editor.
Editing is an art that not a lot of people seem to notice unless it's extremely wrong or particularly mind-blowing and Thelma Schoonmaker has been in the latter category for two-and-a-half decades. Think about some of the work she's done for a minute.
The boxing scenes in Raging Bull.
The last day of Henry Hill's freedom (Is that a fucking Helicopter?) in Goodfellas.
Joe Pesci getting beaten to death and tossed into a hole in Casino.
The sped up ambulance sequences in Bringing out the Dead.
The fight sequences in Gangs of New York.
I could go on about specific scenes and montages, and some would say, "Well that's Scorsese, forget Schoonmaker," but listening to them talk about each other they seem more symbiotic than anyone would care to admit.
And if it were really Scorsese, I'd bet he'd take the credit himself. She's a master of the art in my opinion and you can learn something from her.
I love Glengarry Glen Ross. It gets quoted an awful lot around these parts. I have been in love with Alec Baldwins monolgue in the film for the better part of a decade.
I don't watch all that much Saturday Night Live, but Elias does and he told me about this sketch that Alec Baldwin did a couple of weeks ago where he did his monologue but tailored to santas elves.
I've finally found a link to it.
Here it is.
Just a sidenote, if you're auditioning at a cold casting call for a part and you have Baldwins Glengarry monologue prepared and you nail it, I'd let you come to call-backs almost no matter what.
I read this article in the Post this morning. Basically, it says that Bush has been meeting with newspaper editors for damage-control purposes. I think damage-control for his image, he says national security. In his mind, I'd bet they're the same anyway. On top of that there is the admission by two reporters that they were paid off by Jack Abramoff, Republican Lobbyist, to write stories favorable to his lobby.
And who could forget the circus that went on a while ago (have we forgotten about it already) when Armstrong Williams and others took money from the administration itself to write stories and appear as pundits in favor of certain Bush policies that weren't all that great.
Can someone say "Ethics Probe?"
Something fishy is going on, indeed. And it's big.
Tampering with the press isn't right and Bush is running out of his magic juice that allows him to dodge anything. He can only dodge bullets like this and the warrentless wire-taps and election fraud for so long.
Saturday, December 24, 2005
CLICK ON LINKS BELOW TO PLAY:
THE SPIRIT OF CHRISTMAS short film
By Trey Parker and Matt Stone
THE FORGOTTEN CAROLS MP3s:
1. MERRY F@@KING CHRISTMAS
2. CHRISTMAS TIME IN HELL
3. THE DREIDEL SONG
4. THE CHRISTMAS POO
5. THE CIRCLE OF POO
6. OH HOLY NIGHT (Sung by Eric Cartman)
MORE TO COME...
Did you know that Doug Fabrizio cheated on his first wife while she was pregnant?And then I checked our stats on the blog to find dozens of hits from blogsearch and technorati with "Doug Fabrizio" as the search string. They all came from the same IP address in Salt Lake City (18.104.22.168). Then I started checking links to all the other sites that had mentioned Doug Fabrizio in some way and they all had the same thing too. And those that didn't have that message looked as though they had deleted the message at about the same time.
Did you know that she found out and kicked his ass out of the house?
He married the woman he was running around behind her back with, so I guess that's something.
It's mighty weird. I wonder if he did something to piss someone off and their best form of revenge was to post comments like these on a bunch of obscure blogs. (seriously, the most recent post about Doug was mine from a couple of weeks ago and it was well into the months beyond that.)
Personally, I couldn't care less what he does in his personal life, he gives great interviews and I like to listen to his show alot. I'm fascinated with the idea that someone (his ex maybe?) was so infuriated with him that this was the only course of action left. It's just plain interesting.
I wonder if we'll ever really know for sure.
Friday, December 23, 2005
I'm still a fan of Murtha's plan. What incentive is there for the Iraqi's to stand up for themselves if we're standing up for them? We need political solutions to Iraq, not military ones. I think they'd have a much better time standing up for themselves if we weren't there as we are the main targets. But according to Murthas plan, we'd be in the outlying countries, ready to swoop in if there was trouble the Iraqi security forces couldn't handle.
Read Murtha's Plan if you haven't yet. It makes a lot of sense, which is something very few things do in George Bush's America.
Thursday, December 22, 2005
For a short time only, the first 26 minutes of this controversial film will be available to watch or download FOR FREE on the website, http://www.thisdividedstate.com
Also, be sure to grab the DVD before the holiday season is over!
Information on the film:
"Filmmaking Gold!…Extremely Moving…" -The New York Times
"Excellent!...A Fascinating And Infuriating Story…" -TV Guide
"A Fascinating Film!...See It!" -Robert Greenwald, Walmart: The High Cost of Low Price
"THIS DIVIDED STATE" is a documentary about liberal filmmaker Michael Moore's controversial visit to the "red" state of Utah 2 weeks before the 2004 election. Religious Mormons and local conservatives rose up in protest of Moore and began a crusade to cancel his speech. FOX NEWS' Sean Hannity came out one week before Moore to offer a conservative point of view, but it just added to the mounting chaos. Protest, bribery and even death threats descended upon a small, quiet Mormon town and some even claimed that Moore's arrival would usher in the Apocalypse.
A controversial film about the "divided state" of civil discourse in America and the ongoing battle of "red versus blue" ideology. Free speech on the rocks...
OFFICIAL SITE: http://www.thisdividedstate.com
NOTE: The first 26 minutes of the film are available for a limited time on the website.
The worse news is that neither of these solutions actually solve the problem.
The solution to the problem is to stop using oil. How is that going to happen? A lot of ways. Some of them are much easier than you would imagine.
My solution: What about Bio-Diesel? Did you know that the Diesel engine was designed to run on just about anything and was originally demonstrated at the 1900 worlds fair using nothing but Peanut Oil to power it? Why can't we have all the farmers whom we pay to not plant food just plant rapeseed and use that for fuel? Then we could all just start using diesel cars. Wouldn't that increase demand for new vehicles that use pre-existing technology?
This would help global warming. This would help foreign oil dependance. This would make the air cleaner. This would make driving to work affordable. This would allow John Q. SUV-Driver to commute to the city from the suburbs again.
Can anyone give me a reasonable argument against this? Seriously, let me know if there's something I haven't considered.
In addition to things like Bio-Diesel, why not move towards things like solar power and wind energy? And why can't we pour cash into hydrogen cells?
There's a lot of things we can do. ANWR shouldn't be the top of the list of ways to fix dependancy. If you ask me, neither should gas mileage requirements. Alternative fuels should be at the top of the list, special interest groups be damned.
Wednesday, December 21, 2005
If the Bush administration still thinks they have a mandate to force through whatever tripe they want they are crazy. I can't believe they are opposed to the extension on the Patriot Act while it's being debated as well. Well I can. The Administrations position on it is quite politically smart. "We are risking lives if we don't just pass it now. Don't debate. Just pass it." They know that the provisions of the bill that would protect Civil Liberties won't give them the over-reaching powers that they want. And there's no way that Civil Liberties protections wouldn't pass given enough time because that's actually the will of the people. So, if George Bush comes out and says "This is reckless, just pass it how I want it now," it forces people who trust him to say, "screw Civil Liberties."
I just don't think the country is getting any less divided. Steve talks alot about not being red-states or blue-states but purple-states, but seeing votes and debates like this I really start to wonder.
I think the purple state idea is true in that we all want our Country to be better, stronger, safer and more compassionate. The Red-Blue divide comes into play when we try to figure out how to make that happen.
Monday, December 19, 2005
So, when I heard about this, I got really excited. I never, ever, ever expected Carmike Cinemas to be the leader in digital projection. But it's good to see.
I got to see about 10 minutes of Revenge of the Sith on one of these Christie machines and all I can say is "wow."
This is the future of film and I can't wait.
On a sidenote, this is way bigger news than anyone is giving it credit for. This is the third largest theatre chain in the country. That's a lot of projectors. I can't find news of it on IMDB, AICN, Google News, JoBlo, nothing. Is that weird, or have I actually scooped someone?
The First was A Hobo and His Coffee. I love silent films and it's infinitely fascinating to see what ideas and emotions you can produce using intercut images and music. No words. No dialogue. A Hobo and His Coffee was an attempt at a poignant feeling and I think it comes across. For a silent film it might seem a little long but I think if you can manage to get through it, it's worth it.
The Second is Breather. This was just an experiment with sound and images. I wanted to record a monologue on a mini-cassette recorder and film some images to it. So I wrote a cheesy monologue and turned it over to Matthew J. Baird. Then I went in a cut it all wacky and I think to good effect.
Maybe I'm wrong though. Maybe this stuff sucks. But when you take into consideration both of them took about 6 hours to go from, "I want to shoot a short," to, "Okay, it's up on the internet," they seem like masterpieces.
Worse comes to worse, just check them out. I doubt you'll be mad at me for taking that 8 minutes of your time.
Sunday, December 18, 2005
Let's think about this logically.
Can you think of two better characters that one could play as well as he did? And could you think of an actor who turned in performances as perfect as these and not get nominated?
Is it because he's wearing a digital costume? I say who cares.
He deserves the nomination, and the award and no one will be able to convince me otherwise.
Saturday, December 17, 2005
The Patriot Act. If there is a piece of legislation more in need of checks and balances I'll eat my hat. I'm glad the Democrats fillibustered this. It would be a shame if they allowed themselves to be bullied into passing this dangerous and civil-liberty infringing law without scrutiny.
They should rename this the "Big Brother is Watching You Act." Benajmin Franklin said it best:
They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.Let's all remember that Bush is the one calling for the renewal under the basis that America is more secure because of it. Remember the Former 9/11 commision's report card from a couple of weeks ago? If the Patriot Act led to failing grades in 9/11 style attacks a few weeks ago, why is it so important now? Why isn't the congress debating legislation that would actually fix the problems in National Security outlined in their report? This just seems like another political ploy to distract from the real problem because no one actually wants to fix it.
Friday, December 16, 2005
There is a huge update over at Saturday Shorts in the MEDIA section.
There's some stuff over there to watch that might need a little explaining. I'll just go down the list of short films.
First on there is the "Standing 8" teaser. "Standing 8" was a movie that Elias and I were trying to get off the ground a couple of years ago. This trailer is what we put together to show potential investors. If we had actually known any potential investors at that time, I'm sure it would have worked. Steve actually came on board as the AD on that project, that's actually how Elias and I met him.
The "Infidelity" teaser is the same story, it's just a couple of years older. Elias and I wrote the script with another friend (Ryan Williams) and he was planning on directing with Elias and I producing. That's how the trailer was put together as well.
I don't know anything about "Mikes first short film" beyond the fact that it's Mike Newman's first short film.
Next is Mucha Libre, which was a music video my little brother and I put together in about four hours. It's quite funny.
Next is Pirate Club Episode 2. Elias and I help Derek write the comic book and every once in a while we put together a little short film of the Pirate Club. I cut this one and enjoyed doing so.
Next is the Redemption which is something Paul Green and Dave Skousen and Joel put together for a 24 hour film festival.
Lastly is "Toy Aisle." Jason and Derek ad-libbed that in one take. So... yeah.
Go watch them. They're all pretty good or at the very least worth a chuckle.
Congress took time out of their busy schedule to protect the symbols of Christmas.
And then Rep. John Dingell from Michigan had this to say about it. This is good times. I hope someone has footage of this.
Here's the Daily Kos analysis of the congressional debacle.
Here's another Daily Show clip.
The Fictitious war just needs to stop. At the point where congressmen and women are participating in this fabricated war and passing discriminatory legislation against non-Christmas holidays, things have gone too far.
The House of Representatives have illustrated for the second time in the last two months how little maturity they have. From their one line resolution for immediate pull-out that was merely a temper tantrum thrown because John Murtha was right, to actually passing legislation to protect the iconography of Christmas, they have proved without a shadow of a doubt they belong less in the Halls of Congress and more in the halls of a Junior High School.
So, if you want, send Jo Ann Davis a letter. She's the congresswoman who introduced the "pro-Christmas" legislation and let her know that she has more important things to be doing.
Thursday, December 15, 2005
So I still don't see how I'm ignorant.
But maybe it's just because I'm a...well...you know..."liberal."
Maybe this is what I get for picking on my conservative sister-in-law and somehow couching her with all neo-cons, stereotypical as her positions might be. Perhaps this is some type of poetic justice.
Or something like that...
Also, whether there are more poor people in Venezuela or not, Chavez is still helping Americans in Poverty. It's undeniable, whether you're Conservative or Liberal, Chavez does seem to be trying to make a difference for the better.
Wednesday, December 14, 2005
I loved the movie. It was a solid 10. But I want to take this time to talk about the absurdity of not enjoying a movie because of "bad CGI." A number of people, my own sister among them, left the theatre complaining as loudly as possible that the majority of the film looked no better than a mere X-Box game and that "Peter Jackson should know better."
To these people I say this: Humbug.
It's a movie. Why do movies need to have a hyper-realistic standard. Did the original King Kong look any more or less realistic? In this case it's the story that matters and if you aren't into the story then who cares about the CGI? Does that mean that Harryhausen movies are shitty because they don't meet the exacting standards of jaded nerds looking for a hyper-realistic cinema experience?
Then they complained that the dinosaurs in Jurassic Park looked better and that film came out 12 years ago. My argument to that is this: The rear projection in Notorious is better than the rear projection in North by Northwest, does that make North by Northwest a shitty film? No. North by Northwest is still a masterpiece, despite some dodgy effects.
But don't get me wrong, the effects in King Kong were amazing. My breath was taken away completely. I never doubted for a moment that Kong was a living, breathing creature that they must have captured and trained for the sole purpose of this production. And all of the sequences with Dinosaurs on Skull Island my have been a bit rubbery, but the human story is too interesting to care. Does the matte line around the Rancor lessen the effect of Anakin Skywalkers redemption? You see what I mean? Why would rubbery dinosaurs effect the tale of King Kong?
It is of my opinion that unless the CG is exceedingly bad in a film that isn't served well by the effect itself, you are not allowed to bitch about it around me.
I hate deferring to a master, but here it is:
"A special effect is a tool, a means of telling a story. A special effect without a story is a pretty boring thing." --George Lucas
...And King Kong was anything but boring.
Tuesday, December 13, 2005
I feel so naïve. I really thought the good guys might win this one. I’d like to believe that the concept of redemption is not totally lost in our political and judicial systems, but what can you expect from the Terminator himself? I guess all those shitty movies made him believe that justice cannot be served without bloodshed. What an ass hole. How could the people of California give a Barbarian this type of power in the first place? How embarrassing.
By raise of hands, how many of you wanted Morgan Freeman to fry in The Shawshank Redemption? What? No one? We’re all a bunch of bleeding heart cry babies when it’s just make believe, aren’t we? But it jis’ don’t work like that in the ril world, do it?
On the subject of cinema, I submit that we petition George Lucas to further re-cut the ending of Return of the Jedi for his mega-ultra release of the Star Wars super deluxe special edition six pack, due out next year some time. To keep with the times and insure that these classics remain socially relevant, the following revisions should be made:
Moments after Darth Vader “sees the light” and hurls the Emperor into oblivion, saving the universe from another thousand years of military conflict under the opressive boot of the evil Empire, he has a heartfelt "Full House" moment with his son Luke, where he is forgiven for his past transgressions and given a proper Jedi funeral after which he is reunited with the living Force, right? Well, fuck that pansy ass shit. In the real world, Luke would deal out his own harsh brand of street justice beginning with the beheading of his crippled father before he has a chance to “bond” with him face to face, thereby becoming the very thing he fears the most, a heartless killer. After this, Vader shall be given a traitors funeral where the brave and wise Luke, along with Lando, Leia, Han, Chewie and the rest of the gang (Ewoks included) will feast upon his entrails while urinating on his corpse. The ghosts of Yoda and Obi-Wan shall then appear, giving high fives all around whilst blocking the way Vader's path into Heaven, lest he should attempt to sneak past them. Roll credits, only now John William’s original credits theme is replaced with Minor Threat’s “I Don’ t Wanna’ Hear It”.
First up is small, but I couldn't have said it better myself. This leads to what should be the REAL War on Christmas.
Here's a good one about "offensive" liberals in general. It also has a unique and funny tie in to that short story I wrote about "Late-Term Abortion." This guy's blog is a hoot to read anyway. I'm half convinced it's satire.
This one is so full of vitriol I still don't know if it's satire or not. The headline is Liberal Logic from the Looney Left.
You know, reading some of the arguments that believe that the war on Christmas is a real and tangible threat to Christianity, I'm convinced that this is a joke.
This whole thing, on both sides, has to be a joke. There is no way that conservatives can truly believe there is a war on Christmas because people say "Happy Holidays" more often than "Merry Christmas."
Personally, I don't like Christmas. I've been arguing for two weeks now about not putting the Christmas tree up yet. It's not that I'm some type of "secular liberal fag," as John Stewart remarked, it's just that the Holiday causes too much tension and stress and hustle and bustle for me to want to participate. I can't go anywhere near a mall (not that I go in malls anyway) or a store for a good month, plus some, because everyone else is running themselves ragged looking for that perfect gift for little Jimmy and Susie. I have to admit, I do like giving gifts though. But I don't think we need to use Christmas as a pretense to do that. And just becuase I don't like the tone of the season doesn't mean I get pissed off when someone tells me, "Merry Christmas."
The problem with these Conservatives is that they want Christmas to be this massive consumerist boner fest. You want to keep your "Christian" identity? You want people to respect your holiday as anything more than "shopping season?" Then start treating it more like a religious observance and less like an excuse to shop yourself stupid and into the poor house.
Take Christmas back, but don't blame "liberals" or "atheists" or "secularists" for the loss of the meaning of Christmas. It's Christian's who have turned their religion and it's holidays into an excuse to sell more stuff and make themselves rich. They're the smae Pat Robertson-types that think the Bible is a handbook for getting-rich-quick.
Monday, December 12, 2005
No one has declared war on Christmas. Anyhow, I just wanted to put together a round up of stories , audio and video about it that I think are good.
This is from onegoodmove.org, here is a good recap of all of Bill O'Reilly's "War" on Christmas lunacy.
Here's one from Crooks and Liars that's a good 10 minutes, but it's really good.
Another one from onegoodmove.org, here is a dynamite Daily Show clip that is funny even after seven viewings in which The Daily Show attacks Bill O'Reilly's craziness.
And here is a very good discussion about it on Doug Fabrizio's always interesting "Radio West." This is an hour long but it's fascinating. He has people on that explain and debunk this entire "War on Christmas" business and they explain exactly where it came from (it started with Henry Ford's anti-semetic Conspiracy theories.)
It's all good stuff.
Sunday, December 11, 2005
Friday night I was able to see Syriana and it was an amazing film. It didn't play down to the audience and let you put the story together yourself. You're shown five small pictures of a thrilling political story and are forced to connect the dots all by yourself. It's like a Jack Ryan movie, only good and less insulting to the audience. It has a biting social commentary that's relevant to everything the American Government has done to a foreign country in the last twenty years and it's relevant to what the Administration is still doing. I would advise seeing it.
Now. Go see it.
On Saturday night I decided I had nothing better to do and saw Elizabethtown. It was not good. Far from it. In fact, it was the opposite of good. Cameron Crowe needs to stop making Cameron Crowe movies. He's too in love with his own style. Elizabethtown was like a bizarro, shitty version of Garden State. And Orlando Bloom puts in a performance on par with Cary Elwes' in Saw. Yes, it was that bad. Why won't directors let him speak above a harsh whisper? I don't get it. And Crowe actually forces Kirsten Dunst to suck. I mean, she's not the best actress or anything, but she can turn in a performance. Anyone else seen Spiderman? Basically, if I had to pick two words to describe this motion picture, they would be: "Fecal" and "Preposterous." "Pretentious" and "Shitty" would be the top two runners-up. I would advise against seeing it. At all costs.
Saturday, December 10, 2005
I think in my past posts about my sister-in-law's Conservative lunacy (I'll explain the difference later in the post about the difference between Right Wing-lunatics and ACTUAL Conservatives) I've failed to mention the fact that she is a Political Science Major at UVSC. For one of her classes (I think she said Geography) she had to look up some raw data about countries and stumbled upon some about Venezuela.
She explained to me that Chavez was, and I quote, "an unpopular moron." She went on to explain that, and again I quote, "His country has gone down 8.9% since he took office."
I had no idea what this statement could possibly mean. His country had gone down 8.9%?
She didn't have any of her documentation with her, but asssured me that I would find everything in order. She left it on my kitchen table. I assured her that I would offer it the same scrutiny as her paper on poverty and would proceed to shred it apart just as I did the other. She told me that the other paper, despite my shredding of it's "facts" and assertions was still, and yet again I quote, "solid and true. I believe it. You haven't been to Arkansas." As though her anecdotal mission experience was more accurate than the census bureau and a number of other credible sources I found. I told her as much.
So, I went and got the papers. The first was this paper: Social and Political Divisions Frustrate Efforts to Improve Venezuelans Lives. From this paper came her assertion that Hugo Chavez is wildly unpopular in his country and is running it into the ground. And by the sound of the headline, one might assume that she was right in her interpretation of it. But if you actually read the article, it goes on to say that Chavez was dogged by the 2002 Coup and resulting work strike and that these have impeded progress in his country, but despite these setbacks, UN agencies have seen advances in health and longevity in the people and the article applauds Chavez' broad-based response to HIV/AIDS.
To directly refute the claims of unpopularity, I found the following articles: Indybay. Alternet.
The only thing I could find that said Chavez was wildly unpopular was this from the BBC. Although, perhaps I see it through a filter, but it seems as though the opposition is fueled by America and consists largely of the wealthy in Venzuela.
That being said, you should also read all of these Greg Palast articles about Venezuela.
According to this site, Automobile sales in Venezuela have risen 73% over last year. does this sound like a country that's down 8.9%? Venezuela also enjoyed 16 percent GDP growth in 2004. Sound like things are getting better? Thought so.
Then I went through the other paper which was a Demographic Data and Estimates sheet for Countries and regions of the World from the same Population Reference Bureau source. I can't find anything on it about Venezuela and 8.9%, but that could just be because she didn't have the papers with her. But I did find this article that I thought was quite helpful as well: A Note on Venezuela's Economic Performance. This article went on to support the fact that although the numbers don't look on the surface like Chavez has turned things around, he has turned things around plus some. This came from the Center for Economic Policy and Research.
Then her and her mother mentioned the fact that Chavez was a godless communist because he kicked all of the Mormon Missionaries out of Venezuela. Which, at best, is only a half truth. He only kicked out those with US passports. All the others were allowed to stay. Why? Because he felt that they might be able to be used as spies for the CIA. Crazy? Maybe. Or maybe not. Or maybe he's sick of the church doing sketchy things with Venezuelan customs. I'll let Steve talk about that, as he served his mission in Venezuela and actually has proof of the actual wrong-doing.
Anyhow, long story short, this is another instance of how much conservatives like her have no idea what they're talking about. (She told her sister that it didn't matter how much I said she was wrong, I was the one who was wrong because I'm uneducated and not currently enrolled in school. I don't recall any schools paying her to come speak to their students...)
Oh, now to the difference between good Conservatives and dumb ones. I have some good friends that are and/or were in the military and I was talking with them a few weeks ago. We talked alot of politics, religion and philosophy. They're conservative, I'm a...well...you know... A "liberal." And in talking religion, we discussed the Christian way of taking care of each other and all of the socialist ideals that Christianity espouses.
He's a good Christian, I think I am, despite my lack of belief in an actual God, merely an internal transcendent thing... long story... We agreed about all the things that needed to happen in this country to make it better, better health care covering more people, social safety nets, etc.
Where we differed was politically. He felt that what we wanted for this country was the same. I feel the government has a responibilty in taking an active role in that process. My friend felt the oppposite, he felt it was the governments job to stand out of the way and let things work on a community level. This was someone whom I was able to have an intelligent and civil conversation with and we found that our beliefs about the way people should be treated, Christian-like, were the same. We found we differed in the way those goals should be reached. He was what I would call a smart conservative.
The dumb Conservatives are the ones who just shout Republican party talking points, like my sister-in-law.
Friday, December 09, 2005
Citgo Petroleum Corp., which is controlled by the Venezuelan government, signed a deal with three Bronx housing nonprofits to sell 5 million gallons of heating oil at 45 percent below the market rate, an estimated savings of $4 million. The discounted oil will heat 75 Bronx apartment buildings, housing 8,000 low-income working poor and elderly tenants.I really can't say anything more about this than the excerpts of the article I posted above. Hugo Chavez is doing more to positively affect the lives of the poverty-stricken in American than George Bush is.
"A lot of families are struggling," said Lenice Footman, who hopes her $600 monthly rent will be reduced. Neighbor Dionne Morales agreed, saying she is overlooking the criticism directed at Chavez. "If he can give oil to my country and help the lives of my community, I'm impressed," she said.
"The government should have done it," said Shirley Manuel, 52, a tenants' rights activist, wrapped up tightly in her wheelchair. "This is their country, this is their people -- they should be taking care of their own."
These are the kinds of deals Democrats should be brokering if they want to win in office. "Compassionate" Conservatives wouldn't be able to keep up with this kind of compassion. They would mop up in the elections.
Now, I don't like making top ten lists because they are constantly changing, but the reason I do like them is that it forces you to evaluate, even for a moment in time, what your tastes and influences are.
I've been on the lookout for a research assistant for a screenplay I'm working on and the first round of entry consisted of listing your top ten favorite movies. It gives you an idea of the type of person they are and how they would be to work with.
I was told by Charlie, one of the girls we met at our convocation down at Snow College, that her entire office had been working on theirs and I decided I would share my list and then ask everyone who reads this blog to post theirs in the comments.
So, here's mine and all of them are hotlinked to the IMDB. And these are in no particular order. Also, the Star Wars movies are excluded from this list as well as the Indiana Jones movies. They are above my list, I just like them too much and for different reasons.
1) Seven Samurai
3) Citizen Kane
4) American Graffiti
5) Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid
7) Who Framed Roger Rabbit?
8) Raging Bull
10) The Godfather
I don't know. As I get this list together, I've already got a list of honorable mentions that I want to put together. I've even got a few questions for myself. Such as, "Where's all the Hitchcock and Kubrick you dumbass?" And, "I can't believe you forgot Charade and Goodfellas, or even Double Indmenity." And I'm wringing my neck because I forgot to put the Third Man on the list as well as The Last Temptation of Christ.
God-damn these lists. I tried to pick movies that for 1) I watch frequently (other than Star Wars and Indiana Jones, I can't stress that enough) and 2) I try to get other people to watch alot. (FUCK! I forgot Glengarry Glen Ross and Network!)
Maybe a better list would be filmmakers. Filmmakers who will park my ass in a theatre seat no matter what. Why don't we save that one for next week?
UPDATE: I actually let out a roar of anger that I left DARK CITY off of my list. The fact that I did both confuses and infuriates me.
UPDATE 2: I put steves list below this post so it's in better context.
1) 2001: A Space Odyssey, Stanley Kubrick
2) Blue Velvet, David Lynch
3) The Godfather Part II, Francis Ford Coppola
4) Roger and Me, Michael Moore
5) Paradise Lost, Bruce Sinofsky and Joe Berlinger
6) American Movie, Chris Smith
7) The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King, Peter Jackson
8) Dr. Strangelove, Stanley Kubrick
9) Capturing the Friedmans, Andrew Jarecki
10)Full Metal Jacket, Stanley Kubrick
But I was able to suspend enough disbelief and go back to being a kid that I reall enjoyed it.
Let me stress that: This is a kids movie. This is the movie to show your kids before they are old enough to grasp The Lord of the Rings.
And I'm so glad that Adamson went with generally period music. I was afraid that instead of the Andrews Sisters I was going to get like... the Dixie chicks or something.
And the Christian undertones don't bother me. It's all mythology to me and it's all fascinating. If you ask me, Narnia is every bit as relevant as a religious teaching as The Bible, Star Wars or the Odyssey.
I also loved these books as children. So that explains a connection to the characters I'm not sure I would have had if I hadn't grown up with them. It was the same thing with Sahara. I think it was a bad movie, but I was so enamored by the characters after having read Dirk Pitt books from the time I was in grade school and beyond.
So, go see it and be sure to take your kids.
(Also, Prince Caspian was my favorite of the books, I can't wait to see that one on screen.)
Wednesday, December 07, 2005
War veterans are the most interesting people in the world to talk to.
Tuesday, December 06, 2005
Read this one here, too. This one comes from the Times of India.
People around the world are seeing the collosal failures of George Bush and he's not doing us any good.
And if I hear one more conservative shouting, "These people shouldn't be talking about the failures of the government, they're giving information to terrorists and making us less safe, blame them," I'm going to scream.
The only people who are at fault here is the Bush regime and the House and Senate, not people pointing out how badly they've failed.
And remember, this is what they ran their election on. They promised that they were making us safer and it was impossible for the opposition to do it. While it might have been impossible for the Democrats, then what makes them so unwilling now?
(photo courtesy: Freeway Blogger.)
I don't believe it. After months and months of becoming an icon for everything wrong and evil, Kay Anderson finally has an avid fan.
For those of you who have actually seen THIS DIVIDED STATE, I don't need to tell you how hilarious it is that someone would actually describe Anderson as "quite generous". Maybe they were referring to that scene in the film where Anderson ATTEMPTS TO BRIBE THE COLLEGE WITH $25,000! Generous, indeed.
"Free speech works because most of us have the good sense to know when to keep our mouths shut!"- Kay Anderson, Freedom Fighter
Monday, December 05, 2005
I saw the trailer to X-men 3 tonight.
I still have no increasing level of faith in this project.
Juggernaut looks as though he found Ram-man's old costume from the Filmation He-Man series in a dumpster. Beast looks as though he could go either way.
Why is Jean with Magneto? Is making her "bad" instead of "dead" or even "phoenix" the best Ratner could come up with? Last I checked, Dark Phoenix never had any group affiliations.
I suppose we'll see, won't we.
"What could be so repulsive after all, during the Great Depression, especially, and with yet another war for natural wealth and markets coming, in a young man's belief that each person could work as well as he or she was able, and should be rewarded, sick or well, young or old, brave or frightened, talented or imbecilic, according to his or her simple needs? How could anyone treat me as a person with a diseased mind if I thought that war need never come again--if only common people everywhere would take control of the planet's wealth, disband their national armies and forget their national boundaries; if only they would think of themselves ever after as brothers and sisters, yes, and as mothers and fathers, too, and children of all other common people--everywhere. The only person who would be excluded from such friendly and merciful society would be one who took more wealth than he or she needed at any time."
You're right, this probably isn't possible, but it's an ideal we can work towards.
Things would be a lot better.
But, it won't last long: The Washington Post today talks about the Democrats being "split over Iraq". Uh, oh. This all sounds too familiar. Democrats not being able to make a solid and precise decision. I wrote a while ago (The Rise of the Democrats), that more Demos need to come out publically and have their point of view known. And that's happened, but they're all saying different things. Why can't they all get together (with their idiot leader Dean) and ask, "So, what's the party's official position here?" They decide on one maybe two major points and then turn around and go on the cable news channels speaking the same language. It's not the freakin' hard, guys.
Ok, and someone needs to bitch slap this guy:
He's seems nice enough, but he says batshit things like "Everything is going fine in Iraq!". Ok, Joe, first of all, you're wrong. And second of all, that's not the official position of your party, so shut the hell up. Individualism is fine and dandy and having your own opinion is super, but the American Public doesn't give a rat's ass about your nifty insight. They want to see unity on both sides. When one side comes apart (Republicans with Rove, Delay, Libby), they shift away from them. So now the ball is with you, Democrats. Don't make the same mistake. You have been blessed with an undeserved pair of gigantic, dinosauric balls. Stop jerking off.
Sunday, December 04, 2005
I don't think the movie is going to suck.
I hope not anyway. But the story is so oddly simple yet so much else is going on in it. It's ripe for dissection in a mythological sense (it's a retelling of a much more popular mainstream myth). But at the end of the day it's just an interesting and engaging story.
I have to tell you the first and foremost reason this movie could go south.
The director is the man responsible for Shrek.
I know, I know, I'm doing all I can to control my gag reflex as well. Shrek was a terrible movie and five will get you ten that the sequel was too.
I just hope the quality of the source material has some Deeper Magic from before the Dawn of Time that will let it come through this man's hands unscathed.
So, I'll see everyone on Thursday night for the midnight show. I hope.
SIDENOTE: I'm probably not going to write a review about Kiss Kiss, Bang Bang! Suffice to say that it skates a thin line of being too stylized and pretentious (like Snatch was). And I think the only thing that keeps it on this side of sanity is Robert Downey, Jr. And it's not a "great film" either. It's just entertaining as all hell.
Saturday, December 03, 2005
Friday, December 02, 2005
My guilty pleasure is science fiction films.
I really like them (except the Matrix, fuck those movies). I went and saw Serenity tonight and was quite pleasantly surprised. The problem with science fiction nowadays is that, generally, it sucks. This felt like a Kurosawa/Leone movie in space. It had some elements that I liked that felt a lot like some Heinlein I'd read in "The Past Through Tomorrow."
I really liked it.
It wasn't Star Wars or anything, but I really enjoyed it. Yes, you need to suspend disbelief here and there, but it was solid and most importantly entertaining.
Go see it, or at least rent it.
I know I'm going to get my hands on the TV series that it spun from now... and I can't wait.
Thursday, December 01, 2005
Wednesday, November 30, 2005
Steve will be around later to say a thing or two about this, but apparently someone has dressed up a MySpace account that looks almost identical to ours. I'm not really sure why.
We found out today when someone emailed us asking about a DVD release party tonight. I didn't know about a DVD release party. Did you?
So, a bunch of pranksters who think they are cool are up to no good. If you want to be added as a friend to our REAL MySpace account, visit us here and let us know.
My little brother and I put this music video (Mucha Libre) together in about 4 hours, from pre-production to exported Quicktime movie.
Just watch it. I assure you it's worth a chuckle. (and BTW, he picked the song)
Saturday Shorts is what we use to mess around with film in a less-serious way than stuff like This Divided State. We try to make short films on a Saturday and no more than that. Sometimes they work out well and other times they don't. This update will have a variety of that sort of thing and some trailers to other more polished projects we've done. I'll put the link up as soon as it's ready, but in the meantime, enjoy the music video.
And be sure to let me know what you thought in the comments area.
Well, I'm sure I'm not the only one on the internets posting about this, but George W. made a speech today that was a rehash of his tired old "stay the course" stump speech.
I, for the life of me, don't understand what was wrong with Murtha's plan. Some of Georges Generals have agreed that American presence inflames the insurgency problem and Murtha proposed that we phase the troops out of Iraqs borders and into the borders of surrounding nations, ready to swoop in if the heat gets too much for the Iraqi security forces. It'll be a trial by fire for the Iraqi security forces, to be sure, but at the risk of mixing metaphors, wouldn't it do them better to throw them in the pool and let them sink or swim?
I'd bet that not only would they swim, the rate of insurgent attack would drop sharply.
I'm really sick of getting these publicity stunt speechs. Although I disagree with most everything he stands for, John Warner (R-VA) has suggested that Bush begin doing weekly FDR-style fireside chats. (scroll to the middle of the page) That would be a step in the right direction. We should modernize it a little though, put it on TV and let Bush deal with an audience with 50% for him and 50% against. This would help with transparency, the more they come out and talk about it, the more we know what they're up to.
On second that, that might be bad. The more Bush talks about his victory strategy in Iraq, the surer I am we're going to get our asses handed to us.
Monday, November 28, 2005
People with this utter disregard for anything but their own financial well being deserve to be boiled in their own pudding.
Sunday, November 27, 2005
It's an interesting thing to give some thought to. And I can't say I totally disagree with him.
Personally though, I see her less as Dukakis and more as Mondale. Especially since I truly believe McCain is going to take the Republican nomination.
If anyone is interested, email me a list of 10 of your favorite movies and where you are. I'd prefer someone within 30 or 40 miles of Utah County.
We'll go from there.
Friday, November 25, 2005
BEGIN EMAIL: "I'm forwarding the following e-mail that I just sent to FOXNews because I hope that you agree with the theme of my message to them and will write an e-mail of your own. Further, I encourage you to become more proactive with countering the moral and ethical decay that is sweeping this country with greater persistence. All failed structures whether tangible or intangible began as small, apparently insignificant, cracks in the construction material or human character.
To Whom It May Concern [AT FOXNEWS]:
The replacement last night for Shepard Smith's show that aired from 7-8 P.M. reported that Elton John was going to have a civil union with some guy. In closing the story, this reporter stated that there wasn't anything wrong with being Gay. I take exception to that statement. While I don't think any person should ever be personally attacked for his or her beliefs, I do believe a wrong principle should be exposed, when confronted, particularly for the sake of children and teenagers. Therefore, I'm writing this e-mail as a counterpoint.
The homosexual lifestyle is not normal. One would, I hope, acknowledge that one needs to be careful with what he or she puts into his or her mouth or sickness and possibly death will occur. One, as well, is careful with what he or she allows to be placed into his/her nose, ears, eyes and onto any open wound. I gained this knowledge throughout my life from many different sources. Throughout my life, as well, I have been taught, informally and formally, that the anus is an opening of the skin at the end of the large intestine. Its purpose is to allow fecal material to exit the body. This is the last stage of the digestive process. No one has ever told me, whether informally or formally, that one of the purposes of the anus is to have a man's penis thrust into it. In other words, to have your reporter suggest that being Gay is normal, in fact, is not only irresponsible but also a dangerous lie.
I have come to trust FOX News with not only being fair and balanced but, as well, not being politically correct. I hope this reporter's reckless comment doesn't reflect a shift from in your organization's reporting philosophy.
Thank you for your time with this matter." END EMAIL
Jesus Tap-Dancing Christ. Can you say, "Extremist"?
Thursday, November 24, 2005
The Christmas lights went up the day after Halloween. Christmas songs in malls started last week. America doesn't give a rat's ass about Thanksgiving. Republican Christians use it as a holiday to thank God for "giving" them America. Native Americans hold "UnThanksgiving" to remember the genocide of their people. And everyone else uses it as a day off and a day to prepare for Consumer Monkey Day. I say, get rid of Thanksgiving.
I say let's have 2 Christmases. It's everyone's favorite holiday anyways and Americans love overkill. And there's no excuse for the economy to not to blossum as well. Two sucker punches of consumer madness will enable the US to pay for any damn war it wants. Also, on Nov. 1st, it'll make sense when all the XMAS decorations go up in Wal-Mart. Christmas #1 will be held on the 4th Thursday of every November. There will be 2 Black Fridays (Consumer Monkey Days). One on the last Friday of October and one after Christmas #1. Then, whatever presents you get during Christmas #1 that you don't like, you can re-gift on Christmas #2.
Need a Jesus Christ tie-in? OK...Say Christmas #1 is for celebrating his "Water To Wine" thing or some shit like that and then Christmas #2 is for celebrating his actual birthday. I know that's bass-ackwards, but who gives a fuck? It just means I get more DVDs wrapped in green and red paper.
Wednesday, November 23, 2005
According to the Washington Post, Citgo and Venezuela have inked a deal with Massachusetts to provide this discounted heating oil in a time of record oil company profits. This deal is said to be costing Citgo $10 million.
This is a good thing for Humanitarian effort.
The sad part about all of this, though? The fact that America, the richest country in the world, needs humanitarian aid. It's admirable that Chavez' government is stepping up to the plate, but I think we should be ashamed of our government for not stepping up to the plate first.
It's a shame that this man has been labeled a threat to democracy and a threat to our country. In my view, the largest threat facing this country are the people in the government (and the Bush Administration) unwilling to help improve the lives of it's citizens. With this action, Hugo Chavez has done more in his presidency for the Poor of America than George Bush has during his.
Now all we need are the Free Clinics for those in Poverty that Chavez talked about and George Bush's America might just be a reasonable place to live.
Tuesday, November 22, 2005
I don't understand why this is such a controversial idea. Let's set benchmarks and say, if these benchmarks happen, then we'll be able to pull out troops by a certain time.
This isn't rocket science. Call it an exit strategy, a victory strategy a freedom strategy, whatever. But we need a list of benchmarks and proposed dates to bring troops home. And I'm sort of in favor of Murtha's plan myself. His plan suggests that we're making the problem worse just by being there and that we need to strategically redeploy to the surrounding areas of Iraq and let the Insurgency die that way.
It's called a tactical redeployment.
I really do believe us just being there makes things worse.
Monday, November 21, 2005
OFFICIAL SITE OF MOVIE
Priase the Lord. I hope this puts them out of business.
I think Clean Flicks is one of the most morally bankrupt business' in the world and if Mel Gibson manages to force them out of business I truly think the world would be a better place. It is, in my opinion, morally reprehensible to revise an artists work.
That would be like me finding the genitals on the David offensive, so I cut that portion of the sculpture and append the remaining upper and lower pieces together. The art is ultimately different and altered beyond recognition.
And they even have a Clean Flix version of Kill Bill. Can you believe that?
Sunday, November 20, 2005
I don't know about you guys, but when I can't get my work done or check my email I get really, really stressed out.
So, in order to maintain my sanity, I went on a binge of movies this weekend.
I started with Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire. This was 12:01 am on Friday morning. It was good, I just think there needed to be more cut out of it. The filmmaking also wasn't as good as Alfonso Cuaron's on The Prisoner of Azkaban.
Then on Friday night, I went to go see New York Doll which was very, very good. It was a highly entertaining and heartwarming documentary I would urge everyone to see. It was also very well structured, in my opinion, it was a very tight and manageable length.
Then on Saturday morning I went out to see Walk the Line. I can't imagine people really liking this if they aren't fans of either Johnny Cash or Joaquin Phoenix. But it's an interesting look at Johnny Cash from a fan. I really knew very little about him personally. Also, I managed to really like Reese Witherspoon in this movie. Bottom Line, I liked it alot.
Then on Saturday night, my little brother and I drove up to Salt Lake City to go see Good Night and Good Luck. It was really good. The moral of the movie was that Television should stop trying to merely entertain people and try to educate them once in a while. I'm going to do a big write up of the media, using Good Night, and Good Luck as my center.
That should be interesting.
I'm still trying to convince someone to go see something with me tonight too. I hear Kiss Kiss Bang Bang is good... And Capote is still playing, too...
Friday, November 18, 2005
One scale of 1-10, this one was a 7.
It wasn't anywhere near as good as Cuaron's Prisoner of Azkaban. That movie was an amazing film.
This had some problems, but it still blew the first two movies out of the water. Which wasn't hard to do, because they suck.
Wednesday, November 16, 2005
A caller called into his show to ask why we didn't consider M-16s and RPGs and whatnot Weapons of Mass Destruction in Iraq, seeing as how we didn't find any. The host of the Rusty Humphries show proceeded to explain that we had found 500 TONS OF YELLOWCAKE URANIUM and nuclear centrifuge parts in BAGHDAD. I was bewildered? Was this satire? Because not only is this patently false it's dangerous as well.
No. This was not satire. The caller, quite the dullard said something to the effect of, "I didn't know that. Now I do... Wow."
This caller became LESS informed by this guy's show. And this is dangerous on more than a couple of levels. A) Lying about things like this is wrong and B) the last thing we need are people in the electorate that believe lies as big as this one. It's insanity.
This guy was so full of hate speech and uninformed I was in awe. As soon as he was done making these absurd assumptions about WMD in Iraq, he announced that he had some good news. The good news?
Fidel Castro has Parkinson's. Which would be one thing, but then he went on to explain how dissapointed he was that Fidel was not affected by something worse. He mentioned specifically that he should be afflicted with AIDS, Cancer or "prefferably" dyssentery.
Wow. He's a real classy guy.
So I decided to find out who this guy was and try to draw attention to how crazy he is. His official Bio (which has a number of terrible spelling mistakes) cites some of his credentials as "having appeared on Wheel of Fortune" and that he was a tour guide at Universal Studios. He also has a "best-selling" album entitled "Bomb Iraq."
Apparently he also wrote "Do the Bartman," although the bio calls it "Do the Bart Simpson."
And with credentials like these, he's on over 200 radio stations.
Doesn't that make you feel good?
Oh, out here in Salt Lake City, he broadcasts from the CBS affiliate.
KSL is reporting that Orrin Hatch is polling at 45% versus "Someone Else"'s 48%. This is good news. I think KSL is ridiculous to think that this makes him strong heading into re-election.
Everybody should take that as an invitation to go learn more about "Someone Else" Pete Ashdown.
The more of Ashdown's work I read, the more I like. It would be great if Steve and Elias and I ("the gang") could somehow get involved with his campaign. How different could marketing a person be from marketing a movie?
And just in case anyone has doubts that Orrin Hatch should go, check out this post: Orrin Hatch is Pro Torture.
Beyond that, I truly beleive that Hatch is completely out of touch. Ashdown also seems way more grounded.
Zula/Willis 08! A step in the right direction!
Why not Zula and Wesley Willis? Why was Christopher Walken somehow a believable candidae, but this dynamic duo instantly insights a knee slapping guffah? Sure Zula may not be an “actual” person and Wesley Willis might be (is) deceased, but that is beside the point.
I submit, that if I were to post two, randomly selected TV anchor man headshots, post them on this or any pseudo-political blog with the headline: Chrisiansen/ Stevenson 08, Moving America Forward, or some stupid shit like that, nobody would bat an eyelash. In fact, I’m positive that quite a few of you would promptly run a Google search of these handsome, well groomed gentlemen. And why shouldn’t you? If you squint your eyes a little, they look a little bit like Joe Montana and Terry Bradshaw, so at least they look the part. Why shouldn’t their candidacy be legitimate? But squint at Zula and Wesley Willis and you’ll see 2-Pac and Biggie Smalls. What exactly am I getting at here? I’ve forgotten entirely.
Basically what I think I’m trying to say is, Zula represents everything that the powerful in our nation do not: Lean, aggressive, black Amazonian women with flat-tops, whose sexual preferences are seriously in question, which is exactly what the Democrats need to become in order to sway the balance of power in this fine country in any meaningful way. They’ve got (to be generous) a wee bit of momentum, now it’s time to sack the bewildered quarterback and run that pigskin into the end zone for a big fat… two point safety. At least there are three quarters left, no time to go soft, because it hasn’t worked yet.
Zula/Willis 08, Try telling her she can’t have an abortion!
P.S. "Political Satire" is redundant.
Tuesday, November 15, 2005
For better or for worse, the Republicans are offering strategies to deal with the problems of the day, whether we like those solutions or not. This is a good thing, whether we like their solutions or not.
It’s my belief that in order for the Democrats to reclaim power, they need to offer productive and reasonable solutions to counter those presented by the opposition. The status quo seems to be this: Republicans define the debate, they pick an issue and write legislation to fix their view of the problem. Democrats hate said legislation and decry the Republicans for partisan hackery and corporate shilling. Sadly, that’s where the cycle generally ends. If the Democrats want to lift themselves from their slump, now that they seem to be feeling empowered, they need to offer sensible solutions in direct response to Republican solutions.
Democrats tend to be against the war. We’d like to see our troops home. The most people in the party seem to be doing is calling for an exit-strategy. Why not outline a clear exit-strategy? Instead of shouting, “There isn’t an exit-strategy!” They’d gain a lot more ground politically if they were to be shouting, “The administration has no exit-strategy. We do, here it is. We’ve mailed this to the President and had 150 Senators and Congressmen sign it.”
The Democrats heads have been spinning because of the recent budget proposals. Instead of argue about the ridiculous nature of the cuts to spending and maintenance on the tax-cuts, why don’t they offer a sensible budget alternative?
I think you get my point. In order to appear strong, instead of fighting about the issues and solutions framed by the opposition, reframe the debates with better solutions.
I know that Democrats have a clear message, a vision to take
Instead, the best argument I’ve heard out of the Democrats for the last 5 years has been, “I’m not Bush.” In my opinion, for the Democrats to make their way out of the hole they've been in for the last 6 years, they will need to be on the offensive insofar as framing the debate. They need to offer the American people a clear vision of where they want to take us and they need to offer realistic plans to get there. And whenever the Republicans choose an issue and run with it, the Democrats need to hijack that issue and offer a better plan to put themselves in the favour of the people.
They can do better than this. I know it.
As soon as the shining stars of the Democratic party that Steve outlined yesterday are able to take this platform to the American people they'll be able to get back to work.
Here are my six platform points that I believe would bring the Democrats to victory:
1) Iraq. The Democrats need come out and say that voting for the war was a mistake. That's obvious. And instead of calling for an exit strategy, make one. It's obvious that we can't withdraw our troops immediately, but we can outline certain benchmarks that will remove our forces from the region. Additionally, we need to make a call for broader UN support. One of the reasons terrorists wish to attack us is because we are in their land, so if we shift the forces from American and Coalition to a UN peacekeeping operation, the level and intensity of insurgent attacks would come down. We also need to remove ourselves from their democratic process.
During the Mid terms, this is obviously going to be a major issue. If Democratic candidates can rally behind a comprehensive exit strategy as part of their platform, they will be one step ahead of the Republicans whose exit strategy has been simply, "Stay the course."
2) The Budget. There has been no limit to outrageous deficit spending, tax cuts and severe cuts to vital programs. There has been much outrage and little action on the part of the Democrats currently to solve this problem. The Democrats can win many voters from both sides of the aisle on this issue and here's how. "We'll bring sanity back to the budget. We will balance it. We won't spend more money than we're making and we won't outsource our debt."
There is no question that we have in power a gaggle of "Un-tax and Spend" conservatives. There is no question that they have marginalized those in their party that believe in fiscal conservatism. If you ask me, fiscal conservatism is common sense. Democrats can frame the debate in a very easy and catchy way: "The Bush administration and the Republicans in the House and Senate have deficit spent hundreds of billions of dollars on America's tab that they have no way to pay back. That would be like you running up a BILLION dollars on your company credit card, switching jobs and handing it over to your successor to figure out how to pay for it as you wash your hands of it. I don't know about you, but I think that's going to cost a lot in interest and that's exactly what's going on here." Bring this issue down to a level people of both sides will understand and you will win votes right here.
3) Social Security. This is the best way for the Democrats to draw attention to the hypocricies of the current Republican cabal while at the same time coming out in defense of an issue that has proved important. It's obvious the majority of American's don't agree with George Bush's ideas about Social Security and the Democrats had a chance to force the issue and counter-propose popular legislation that would fix the problem and serve as a major political defeat for the Bush team. They didn't do this. But now they have another chance and it would be foolish to pass it up because we all already know the Republicans have been losing on this issue for two years. And, in my opinion, the solution is simple and two pronged:
a) include in the Budget provisions to pay back all the extra money raided out of Social Security over the last few decades. Each agency that has benefited from Social Security's prosperity ought to be able to cut some type of fat out of their budget to pay back the money they owe.
b) eliminate the salary cap on the Social Security tax.
Viola! Once again, Social Security becomes solvent and you've won over all of the Baby Boomers hoping to rely on it.
4) Health Care. This is an issue that Democrats mention over and over and over again and people are tired of hearing about it and nothing getting done. But there is no reason why we can't figure out a way to provide every American with affordable (or free) Health Care. This is a chance to have a meaningful debate with conservatives and show the world that Democrats aren't Republicans in bad suits. You'd also win the vote of every person that can't afford Health Care. And Jimmy Smits wasn't far off on the West Wing when he suggested removing the words "over 65" from Medicare.
Yes, it would be controversial, but wouldn't you rather have people talking about this than the regular hot-button issues that get voters hopping mad? Issues like abortion and prayer in school and whether burning the flag should be against the law. Democrats need to force the idea into the dicourse that we need to take care of our people and the first step is making sure they can see a doctor if they're sick, no matter what.
Just see what happens when the Republicans come on TV and try defend the idea that people don't deserve to have Health Care. It's a losing argument and there are enough people without insurance or other forms of Health Care that wouldn't normally vote that you could lure to the polling stations with the promise that they would get free Health Care out of it.
Besides that, it's the morally right thing to do. You can win the Christian vote on this one as well by relating it back to the bible and about taking care of the poor and the sick and the weak.
5) Corporate Accountability. Enron, WorldCom, Halliburton, Phillip Morris, McDonalds, Walmart, Exxon/Mobil, Jack Abramof, Monsanto. These have all become synonymous with corruption and it is taken for granted that they have enough money in their pockets to buy any amount of congressmen and presidents or vice presidents to screw John Q. Consumer. I think the Democratic party needs to sever themselves from corporations. I know that sounds crazy, and I know that the Democrats are having a hard time fundraising as it is, but it would be the best PR move in the world to say, "We are no longer beholden to Corporate Interests and Political Action Committees. We will no longer take their money. We are going to ensure that there is a barrier between legislators and private interest. What we do will be the best for the people and the best for the people is Corporate Accountability. And the best first step is to sever all ties with private entities."
Now this issue leads into other issues like campaign finance reform and whatnot, but it's a major one. People are out there doing all they can to make sure people know about all of the horrible things these companies do. Why not put those efforts to work and be able to tie all of that evil to the opposition. "They are the party of corporate interest. Once again, we will fight for you."
Political campaigns have turned into Nascar Racers and people know it. If the Democrats can step away from that and raise enough money to make sure everyone knows it, they'll be clearly the more trustworthy group.
6) Homeland Security. The way the Democrats can take this issue back is simple. "We understand more about our enemy than our opponents do. Our opponents have made no effort to understand the enemy and we have. We understand why Abu Ghraib makes the situation worse. We understand why Iraq is having the opposite effect on terrorism that the administration. We understand why we have to be held to a higher moral standard. We know what it takes to keep America safe and it's our moral obligation to do it."
Jimmy Carter said on Larry King the other night, "After 9/11 I picked up a copy of the Quran and read it cover to cover. I now understand more about the Islamic Faith and learned more about how certain fundamentalists have perverted that religion into a violent sect of death and destruction. I think our leaders need to know more about why these terrorists hate America."
That's brilliant. And that needs to be part of the message of the Democrats.
But they can't just say, "We understand them better, so we're better suited for the job." They need to back it up with a comprehensive Homeland Security plan that will illustrate to the American people how they are going to be able to sleep more soundly under a Democratic watch. Kerry tried this unsuccesfully during the last campaign, but this can be stepped up with a clear plan of action.
So, that's it. Obviously, there are more issues at hand, but these are the main 6, in my opinion, that will take the Democratic party back where they belong. There are two honorable mentions that need to be addressed and perhaps I'll outline them later and they are: Immigration and Torture.
...TO BE CONTINUED tomorrow with Elias' satirical piece, "ZULA '08". Steve and/or I will also be here with a piece. Then on Friday, Steve and I will both be back for Conclusions.